Valeriano submitted this photo to me and as usual, I like to share the photographer’s words with everyone. I find that there’s a lot of people out there that have either experienced a similar situation or have thought similar ideas. Here’s what he had to say:

“Hi Joe,
I’d like to submit a photo to your blog’s section “Ask Joe”.

I was working this subject (cabin’s at the beach), and after finding a nice composition I decided to add a person to the picture to give it a sense of scale. Not having anybody else than myself to model, I decided to self model.

After I’ve found and set the right exposure, I set my camera with a timed shutter release, and I start to walk into the frame.
Out of the several attempt, this one I think is the picture that I’d like the most.

What do you think about it?

PS I haven’t shot this horizontal, indeed I’m having a problem when trying to compose this kind pictures horizontally: distortion I cannot get rid of n camera. The vertical lines on the edge of the frame are always leaning and trying to correct them in camera seems always quite impossible (I’ll always end up with a composition I don’t like). Do you have any trick or suggestion for this issue?

Thanks,
Valeriano.”

Valeiano,

First of all, as I tell my online class with the PPSOP, and my “Stretching Your Frame of Mind workshops” I conduct around the planet, the key to taking your imagery what I refer to as “up a notch” is to “make pictures” not just take pictures. What you have done by putting yourself in this composition is “making pictures”. So many of my fellow photographers are content in taking pictures of what they see, instead of taking pictures of what they could see if they just stretched their frame of mind.

Ok, having said that, let’s talk about “Showing Scale to Your Photos”. In a nutshell, here’s the important part of that post: “The best way to show the scale within my composition is by including something whose size is already known. That being a person, ship, auto, etc. Without something in your photo, the viewer won’t have any reference as to just how big an area he’s looking at.”

In your photo, there’s really not that much difference in size between everything in your composition, namely the person and the building,  I’m not sure scale is what you were thinking.

Moving on, there’s a lot for the viewer to look at, and the more we give him the more he’ll stick around: There’s a Vanishing Point, Patterns, Texture, Visual Tension, Shape, and light. These are the things found on my ‘Artist Palette’ and have taken this photo “up a notch”.

Take a look at this crop. I’ve made the Negative Space that surrounds the man walking equal on both sides and now feels more balanced. I’ve also darkened it and now there’s more depth in the colors and a greater degree of contrast between the light and dark areas that border each other.

One last note, the vertical lines should be as easy to straighten in a vertical as well as in a horizontal format, so I’m not sure why it is you have trouble. It’s a matter of tilting your camera down to straighten lines that bend in, and tilting your camera up to straighten lines that appear to bend out.

Whenever I’m composing, the first two things I do is to make sure the horizon line is straight, then I tilt the camera up and down and watch the vertical lines close to the edge of the frame until they’re parallel to it.

It’s a nice photo, so thanks for sharing it.

Visit my website at: www.joebaraban.com and check out my 2013 workshop schedule at the top of this blog. Come shoot with me sometime.

Don’t forget to send me a photo and question to AskjoeB@gmail.com.

JoeB

Valeriano, a past student of mine sent me this photo to talk about. For a better understanding of where the photographer is coming from, and what his or her thought process was at the time, I like to copy exactly what they say when submitting. Another reason is that often is the case that others are thinking the same thing or have experienced similar situations.

Here’s what Valeriano had to say:

“Hi Joe,

I’ve recently broken your class rule for the fish-eye lens when composing this subject. Since also at dawn the monument wasn’t lit, the sky was dull gray and hazy with no clue of getting a single ray of dun at sunrise. I’ve also decided to break another of your class rules about white balance and set mine on Tungsten knowing I would get a bluish color cast on what wasn’t lit by artificial lights. Not having any one to model for me, I had to rely on pedestrians climbing the stairs in order to give a sense of scale by having a human figure in the composition.

Please let me know your thoughts, and-as-usual-thank you a lot for your invaluable critique and advice.

Cheers,

Valeriano” 

Ok Valeriano, let me first offer up a quote that was said by a very famous photographer named Ansel Adams. He said, “There are no rules for good pictures, there’s just good pictures”. In my online class with the PPSOP, and in my “Stretching Your Frame of Mind” workshops I conduct around the planet, I do have rules. These rules are only intended for my classes, not necessarily rules you have to live by. I have these rules because I’m a firm believer in teaching fellow photographers how to become stronger at their craft; by using their imagination not gimmicks.

To me, a good photographer doesn’t need to resort to specialty/trick lens or to wash everything in a specific color. A good photographer will rely on his wit, his ability to create good photos in the camera, and a knowledge of the elements of visual design and composition that he’ll get in my class. This has been my thinking for the past forty-six years and I’ve managed to take pretty good pictures without resorting to tricks or manipulation. I guess it’s all about being comfortable in my own skin. When I go out to shoot, I’m confident I’ll come back with something that will be timeless, memorable, and classic…but that’s just me.

In your photo, I hope that the people that view it loves blue, because it’s blue from corner to corner and edge to edge. Even the people you added for scale are blue!!! I’d be interested in seeing how it would look all yellow, or green, or even red? What I’d really like to have seen is this photo looking real. The reason is that you had all the elements to have created an interesting well composed photo that included several of the elements from my ‘Artist Palette’.

For example: Shape (the triangle at the top left), Pattern (the steps), Line (the lines you have that lead the viewer in and out of your frame),  Tension (placing the people close to the edge of your frame), and Scale. In my opinion it would have been enough to carry it without turning everything blue.

As far as the Fisheye lens goes, there are definitely times when it’s used, for example in aerials or to solve industry related problems, but for me those times do not include the concept of “creativity”.  In my opinion, the distortion is distracting, and there’s just not a place for it in the day to day world of picture taking.

 Here is another photo Valeriano shot with a Fisheye and submitted to me. For me, I think it’s an interesting picture that’s obviously well balanced and composed, and I’m sure that there will be people that will “ooh and aah” and there will even be people (usually friends or family) that will say…”Cool man”! If those are the people you’re trying to impress, then I say go for it and don’t take that lens off.

Again, that’s just one opinion, and now I want to leave you with this last thought, “If you have a hammer in your hand and everything looks like a nail, then you have a problem”.

As usual, thanks for sharing your photo and thoughts.

Visit my website at: www.joebaraban.com and check out my 2013 workshop schedule at the top of this blog. Come shoot with me sometime, but please…leave the Fisheye at home.

Don’t forget to send me a photo and question to: AskJoeB@gmail.com

JoeB

Valeriano sent me this photo to talk about. As usual I like to have people read what was said to me when the image was submitted. I find that a lot of photographers share the same problems, or the same stories, or the same ideas so it’s nice to know that you’re not alone. Here’s what he had to say:

“Hi Joe,
I’d really like your critique about this photograph and mainly about my composition.

The little white chapel (with the cypress trees “guarding” it) is an iconic landmark in this Tuscan area named Val d’Orcia (a UNESCO world heritage site). I’ve shot it in many different ways and in many light situations and seasonal situations, as well as with different weather conditions.

Thus this time I went there again, I really wanted to find a different point of view for this subject. The sculpture in the immediate foreground is something that I thought could work to define a frame within a frame composition. I’ve got the idea cause I was together with another photographer at the place I usually go, and he “hates” these sculptures that the landlord allowed to be put on its property by an artist. I always wondered if there was some interesting way to shot ’em, I probably have found one.

Unfortunately this idea came up to me at very last moment I was in my stay at this place. Moreover I was in a very bad creative vision moment for my photography, which, as usual, will start to improve as I’m at the end of a time slice exclusively dedicated to photography.

I didn’t shot it with the right light conditions I would had rather have: at sunset with a nice side light which would had let the texture of the sculpture pop up. Therefore I shot it at twilight.On the left side, in the background, there is also the profile of the little town Pienza, another well known place of this area.

Please let me know your thoughts about it and if there is anything I can improve with this composition.
Thanks a lot,

Valeriano.

Valeriano,

The first thing I felt I needed to do was to turn your photo upside down. For those of you out there that don’t know why I do this, it’s to show how well a composition is balanced. I’m talking about the balance between the Negative Space and the Positive space. In Valeriano’s photo, the Positive Space is the sculpture in the foreground, the small chapel, and the land mass and town in the left background. The Negative Space is the blue sky.

When you look at this photo right side up, the way you meant it to be,  you’re looking at it with the right side of your brain; the creative side. You see a sculpture, a chapel, and a small town, and blue sky. When you look at this photo upside down, you’re looking at it with the left side of your brain; the analytical side. The sculpture, the chapel, the town, and the sky don’t exist anymore. Now, all you see are shapes and how they relate to one another. Now it’s easy to see how well the balance between the Negative and Positive Space actually is.

Is this photo balanced? To me, it’s very heavy on the right side of an imaginary line drawn down the middle. Don’t get me wrong, I’m the first one that would disrupt the way a viewer perceives then processes one of my photos, but when you have an object this large anchored in the foreground, it’s too much.

Since Valeriano wanted to show both the chapel and the town, I would have moved a few steps to the right so as to balance the sky on both sides of the sculpture.

Ok, Valeriano mentioned “framing within a frame”. Since he took my online class with the PPSOP, he learned several ways to create Visual Tension. I also teach this in my “Stretching Your Frame of Mind” workshops I conduct around the planet. One of the ways is to frame a subject, or an object or a scene within a frame. By cleverly using the sculpture and the right edge to frame the chapel, he succeeded. I also show my students how to use perspective to create the feeling of depth. By ‘anchoring’ the sculpture in the foreground he created “layers of interest” which in turn created the feeling of not only depth, but distance and scale as well.

The last thing I want to mention is that people that follow my blog and my work know that I’m very big on light, since light is everything!!! However, in this photo I like the absence of directional light here. There’s something magical about this photo and waiting for the twilight color to take effect. The psychological effect color has on our psyche can’t be dismissed as it has been proven to have certain powers.

Valeriano sent this image to me with this explanation:

Ok, the photo: If you hadn’t mentioned what you were trying to achieve with the letter ‘Q’, I don’t think the viewer would pick up on it…as I didn’t. I like to think of myself as a fairly intuitive/creative thinker, but I didn’t get the letter ‘Q’ or the word Quality. If you look at how the capital ‘Q’ is made, you’ll see that it’s different enough from your cup to make the difference between getting/seeing it or not. I think I might have taken a close look on how the capital letter ‘Q’ is made.

The important thing to always remember is that you won’t be around to explain your thought process. Your photo will need to stand on its own. It needs to be what I refer to as a “quick read”,  unless you’re asking the viewer to comment on an abstract representation of some reality your portraying in your photo. Now, as I continue to look at your image, seeing the letter becomes easier. However, you can’t expect the viewer to look at your photographs that long. If they don’t get it right away, and there’s not a lot of other elements for them to discover in your photos, they’ll move on.

In my online class with the PPSOP, and in my “Stretching Your Frame of Mind” workshops, I tell my students to Consider the scene and its outcome. Make sure what you’re trying to get across is not toooooooo ‘esoteric’.

As far as the photo itself goes, I think it’s a really good shot that accomplished the assignment in a creative way. I think I might also have tried one where their was actual brewed coffee in the cup, and still had the patterns of the beans on the bottom..with some Cognac in it”!!!

🙂

Thanks for the submission Valeriano, and feel free to send me images any time.

Visit my website at: www.joebaraban.com, and check out my 2012 workshop schedule at the top of this blog. Come shoot with me sometime.

JoeB